4.7 Article

Mitigation of radiation nephropathy after internal α-particle irradiation of kidneys

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.11.036

Keywords

alpha particles; internal radiation; radiation nephropathy; aldosterone escape

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01-CA-55349, P01-CA-33049] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Internal irradiation of kidneys as a consequence of radioimmunotherapy, radiation accidents, or nuclear terrorism can result in radiation nephropathy. We attempted to modify pharmacologically, the functional and morphologic changes in mouse kidneys after injection with the actinium (Ac-225) nanogenerator, an in vivo generator of alpha- and beta-particle emitting elements. Methods and Materials: The animals were injected with 0.35 mu Ci of the 225Ac nanogenerator, which delivers a dose of 27.6 Gy to the kidneys. Then, they were randomized to receive captopril (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor), L-158,809 (angiotensin II receptor-I blocker), spironolactone (aldosterone receptor antagonist), or a placebo. Results: Forty weeks after the 225 Ac injection, the placebo-control mice showed a significant increase in blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (87.6 +/- 6.9 mg/dL), dilated Bowman spaces, and tubulolysis with basement membrane thickening. Captopril treatment accentuated the functional (BUN 119.0 +/- 4.0 mg/dl,; p < 0.01 vs. placebo controls) and histopathologic damage. In contrast, L-158,809 offered moderate protection (BUN 66.6 +/- 3.9 mg/dl,; p = 0.02 vs. placebo controls). Spironolactone treatment, however, significantly prevented the development of histopathologic and functional changes (BUN 31.2 +/- 2.5 mg/dl,; p < 0.001 vs. placebo controls). Conclusions: Low-dose spironolactone and, to a lesser extent, angiotensin receptor-I blockade can offer renal protection in a mouse model of internal alpha-particle irradiation. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available