4.7 Article

Effects of varied energy density of complementary foods on breast-milk intakes and total energy consumption by healthy, breastfed Bangladeshi children

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 83, Issue 4, Pages 851-858

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/83.4.851

Keywords

infant feeding; complementary food; energy density; breast milk; breastfeeding

Funding

  1. FIC NIH HHS [1D43 TW 01267] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Information is needed to design studies of the effects of complementary feeding regimens on children's intakes of complementary foods (CFs) and breast milk. Objective: We evaluated the effects of varied energy density of CFs on the time until stabilization of dietary intakes and on total daily energy intakes (EIs) and breast-milk intakes. Design: CFs with low [0.4 kcal/g (LD)] and high [1.5 kcal/g (HD)] energy density were fed 3 times/d to 10 children (aged 9-18 mo) during 2 randomly assigned sequences of three 8-d diet periods (HD-LD-HD or LD-HD-LD) along with ad libitum breastfeeding. CF and breast-milk intakes were measured. Results: Intakes of the HD diet and breast milk did not vary by day of period, but intake of the LD diet increased progressively. During days 5-7 of the last 2 diet periods in each sequence, more of the LD than of the HD diet was consumed (752 +/- 252 and 439 +/- 111 g/d, respectively, P < 0.001), but EIs from CFs were greater with the HD diet. Breast-milk consumption was slightly less (192 115 and 234 +/- 121 g/d, respectively; P = 0.03) but total daily El was greater (774 +/- 175 and 441 +/- 85 kcal/d, respectively; P < 0.001) during the HD than during the LD diet period. Conclusions: New information on the effects of newly introduced diets on daily intakes of these diets and of breast milk can be used to design future studies. Total daily EIs were greater with the HD diet despite its negative effects on breast-milk intakes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available