4.4 Article

Surface deformation related to kink-folding above an active fault: Evidence from geomorphic features and co-seismic slips

Journal

QUATERNARY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 147, Issue -, Pages 44-54

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2005.09.005

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By means of a geomorphological study using 40 in digital elevation model, structural reconstruction by field data, and related geodetic results. we reevaluate the geomorphic features in the Hsinshe area, where multi-step terraces have been previously documented and supposedly provide more information of the neotectonic history. Our results show that two kink-shaped scarps can be discriminated from other terrace risers, which are probably formed by folding instead of faulting as suggested by previous researchers. Two E-W-reconstructed hanging wall cross sections in the north and south show that the fault plane of Chelungpu fault flattens to the east and sinks to the South, creating a monoclinal hanging wall resembling a quarter hemisphere in terms of a 3D model. We propose a kinetic model to explain the surface monocline fold: it is developed when the fault plane presents a fault-bend, such as the case along the Chelungpu fault at Hsinshe. The co-seismic deformation from the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake demonstrates that the model is probably valid. Furthermore, the higher terrace showing larger deformation indicates the influences of active structures on terraces have continuously acted for a long time. The westward tilting of the hanging wall terraces result from the action of the Chelungpu fault and its related structural geometry. Based on the optical-stimulated-luminescence age of 55.0 +/- 12.6 ka of the highest terrace, we can compute the vertical rates across the main thrust and fold scarp in the hanging wall as 7.0 and 2.5 m/kyr, respectively. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available