4.7 Article

Contributions of Chinese-style cooking and incense burning to personal exposure and residential PM concentrations in Taiwan region

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 358, Issue 1-3, Pages 72-84

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.03.026

Keywords

cooking; incense burning; indoor sources; lung; particulate matter; exposure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the effect of indoor sources including Chinese-style cooking, incense burning, cleaning, and people's moving on indoor particle size distributions and concentrations and calculated the personal exposure dose rates in the human respiratory tract (HRT) using time-activity and indoor and outdoor particle size distribution data collected from a traditional Taiwanese residence in central Taiwan region. We applied a simple size-dependent indoor air quality model associated with a compartmental lung model to determine the source emission rates and exposure dose. Cooking and incense burning bad size-integrated source emission rates of 0.042 +/- 0.024 (mean +/- S.D.) and 0.038 +/- 0.026 particles s(-1), respectively. Cooking and incense burning were significant contributors to indoor particle levels for particle sizes from 0.5 to 5 mu m in that the percent contributions to indoor concentrations were 0.334 +/- 0.02 and 0.267 +/- 0.035, respectively. Our results demonstrated that extrathoracic (ET) region had higher average PM mass lung/indoor ratio (0.77) than that of bronchial (BB) (0.52), bronchiolar (bb) (0.27) and alveolar-interstitial (Al) (0.14) regions from both cooking and incense burning events. The average integrated deposition dose rates (particles cm(-2) h(-1)) of 24.11 in ET, 4.68 in BB, and 7.89 in bb were higher than that of 0.011 in Al for both cooking and incense burning events. This research illustrates that exposure assessment based on time-activity and real-time behavior of particle data can provide valuable information on the fate of indoor particles and hazard to human health. (C) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available