4.7 Article

Natural history of intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas:: Actuarial risk of malignancy

Journal

CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 460-468

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.01.018

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & Aims: Natural history of intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas (IPMTs) is unknown. Cross-sectional studies suggest that exclusive branch duct (BD) involvement is associated with a lower risk of carcinoma than main pancreatic duct (MPD) involvement. The aim of our study was to calculate longitudinal risk of malignant transformation of IPMT since the first sign. Methods: All the patients with a diagnosis of highly probable or histologically proven IPMT were included. Actuarial risks of occurrence of at least low-grade dysplasia (>= LGD), high-grade dysplasia (>= HGD), or invasive carcinoma (IC) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method from the first sign attributable to IPMT. The risks according to sex, acute pancreatitis, tumor size, and involvement of MPD were compared by log-rank test. Results: One hundred six patients were included with a proven (n = 76) or probable (n = 30) IPMT. The tumor was confined to 1313 in 53 cases. Median duration since the onset of the first sign to the end of follow-up was 21 months (range, 0-241). Ten-year actuarial risk that IPMT grade was >= LGD, >= HGD, or IC was 67%, 49%, and 29%, respectively. The only morphologic risk factor of malignant transformation was involvement of MPD, with a 5-year actuarial risk of >= HGD of 63% in the MPD group compared with 15% in the BD group (P < .001). Conclusions: Longitudinal risk of at least HGD or IC is time-dependent. Patients with BID IPMT present a much lower risk, justifying a nonoperative surveillance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available