4.5 Article

Upward and downward inclination oil-water flows

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 413-435

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2006.01.001

Keywords

liquid-liquid flow; pressure gradient; hold up; phase distribution; upward flow; downward flow

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of upward (+5 degrees, +10 degrees) and downward (-5 degrees) pipe inclinations on the flow patterns, hold up and pressure gradient during two-liquid phase flows was investigated experimentally for mixture velocities between 0.7 and 2.5 m/s and phase fractions between 10% and 90%. The investigations were performed in a 3 8 mm ID stainless steel test pipe with water and oil as test fluids. High-speed video recording and local impedance and conductivity probes were used to precisely identify the different flow patterns. In both positive and negative inclinations the dispersed oil-in-water regime extended to lower mixture velocities and higher oil fractions compared to horizontal flow. A new flow pattern, oil plug flow, appeared at both +5 degrees and +10 degrees inclination while the stratified wavy pattern disappeared at -5 degrees inclination. The oil to water velocity ratio was higher for the upward than for the downward flows but in the majority of cases and all inclinations oil was flowing faster than water. At low mixture velocities the velocity ratio increased with oil fraction while it decreased at high velocities. The increase became more significant as the degree of inclination increased. The frictional pressure gradient in both upward and downward flows was in general lower than in horizontal flows while a minimum occurred at all inclinations at high mixture velocities during the transition from dispersed water-in-oil to dual continuous flow. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available