3.9 Article

Characterization of lysine decarboxylase-negative strains of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis disseminated in Japan

Journal

FEMS IMMUNOLOGY AND MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages 381-385

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2006.00043.x

Keywords

Salmonella Enteritidis; lysine decarboxylase; cadC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis is one of the leading causes of food-borne diseases in Japan. Typically, Salmonella spp. test positive for lysine-decarboxylase. However, the number of isolates of serovar Enteritidis without lysine-decarboxylase activity increased in Japan in 2003. Among 109 strains from distinct outbreaks, 10 lacked lysine-decarboxylase activity. Nine of the ten lysine-decarboxylase-negative strains showed quite similar pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profiles. Their lysine-decarboxylase phenotype was recovered by introduction of the cadBA locus from an lysine-decarboxylase-positive strain. Although the cad loci of the lysine-decarboxylase-negative strains seemed to be intact without any insertion sequences, cadC, a positive regulator of cadBA, had a single-base deletion at the same position, the 973rd base (cytosine), in all the nine lysine-decarboxylase-negative strains, whereas the wild-type cadC gene has a 1542 bp coding region (514 amino acids). This deletion was expected to produce a truncated (338 amino acids) form of CadC due to a frameshift. Because CadC senses environmental cues such as external pH and lysine through its putative C-terminal periplasmic domain, it is likely that the truncated CadC is not sensitive enough to external signaling to activate the cadBA operon, resulting in loss of the lysine-decarboxylase activity. Our results suggest that dissemination of these genetically closely related strains of serovar Enteritidis accounts for the unusual increase in the isolation of lysine-decarboxylase-negative strains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available