4.5 Article

Early positive biomarker in relation to myocardial necrosis and impaired fatty acid metabolism in patients presenting with acute chest pain at an emergency room

Journal

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages 419-425

Publisher

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.70.419

Keywords

acute coronary syndrome; biomarker; BMIPP; heart-type fatty acid-binding protein; myocardial infarction; single-photon emission computed tomography; troponin-T

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Measurement of circulating biomarkers has enabled early diagnosis and risk assessment of acute coronary syndrome. This study Sought diagnostic values of the first single-point data of biomarkers obtained soon after patient arrival by comparing with scintigraphically quantified myocardial injury in patients presenting with acute chest pain at an emergency room. Methods and Results Serial blood samples were taken soon after arrival in an emergency department in 74 patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome to quantify blood levels of troponin-T (TnT), heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP), rnyocardial-bound creatine kinase (CK-MB), and myoglobin. Myocardial perfusion and metabolic defects were scintigraphically quantified. The first single-point data had high positive predictive values for detecting the defects (80-100%) but low negative predictive values (15-41%). CK-MB and TnT had higher specificities (73-100%) but significantly lower positive rates (22-27%) than the others (61-68%), resulting in greater sensitivities of H-FABP and myoglobin (75-80%) than those of CK-MB and TnT (29-35%). Among biomarkers, TnT peak concentrations most closely correlated with scintigraphic abnormalities. Conclusion H-FABP can contribute to early detection of myocardial injury and TnT is most likely to correlate wit h injured myocardial mass. The differential features of biomarkers are complementary in patients with acute chest pain presenting at an emergency room.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available