4.4 Article

Graft copolymers of methyl methacrylate and poly([R]-3-hydroxybutyrate) macromonomers as candidates for inclusion in acrylic bone cement formulations: Compression testing

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30430

Keywords

graft copolymers; poly([R]-3-hydroxybutyrate); poly(methyl methacrylate); bone cements; compression

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graft copolymers of methyl methacrylate and biodegradable, biocompatible bacterial poly([R]-3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) blocks were synthesized and evaluated as possible constituents in acrylic bone cements for use in orthopaedic applications. The copolymers were produced by conventional free radical copolymerization and incorporated in one commercially available acrylic bone cement brand, Antibiotic Simplex (R) (AKZ). Cements with formulations containing 6.7 and 13.5 wit % of PMMA-graft-PHB were prepared. The morphology of the graft copolymer particles was suggested to influence the ability of the modified cement to be processed. Formulations containing more than about 20 wt % of the graft copolymer resulted in cement doughs that, both after first preparation and several hours later, were either sandy or soft spongy in texture and, thus, would be unacceptable for use in orthopaedic applications. The morphologies of the powders and the volumetric porosity (P) and ultimate compressive strength (UCS) of the cured cements were determined. Micro computed tomography showed that the cements presented average porosities of 13.5-16.9%. It was found that, while the powder particle shape and size for the experimental cements were markedly different from those of AKZ, there was no significant difference in either p or UCS for these cements. The latter was determined to be about 85 MPa for the modified cements and 84 MPa for Antibiotic Simplex. Furthermore, the UCS of all the cements exceeded the minimum level for acrylic bone cements, as stipulated by ASTM F-451. (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals. Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available