4.7 Article

Results of a Japanese Nationwide Multi-Institutional Study on Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Low Rectal Cancer Is It Regional or Distant Disease?

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGERY
Volume 255, Issue 6, Pages 1129-1134

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182565d9d

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22591443, 24659620] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate whether lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LNs) in low rectal cancer are metastatic disease or part of regional LNs that are amenable to curative resection. Background: It is highly controversial whether lateral pelvic LNs should be considered as regional or distant disease, although the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) defines internal iliac LNs as regional LNs of rectal cancer. Methods: Data of patients with stage I to III low rectal cancer who underwent curative resection from 1978 to 1998 were extracted from the multi-institutional registry of large bowel cancer in Japan. Patients with only mesorectal LN metastasis were classified as the mesorectal-LN group. Patients with lateral pelvic LN metastasis localized to or extending beyond the internal iliac area were classified as the internal lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLN) group and external-LPLN group, respectively. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared between the groups. Results: Lateral pelvic LN dissection was performed in 5789 (50%) of 11,567 patients. Overall, 3905 (34%), 411 (3.6%), and 244 (2.1%) patients were classified as the mesorectal-LN, internal-LPLN, and external-LPLN groups, respectively. When the mesorectal LN group was subdivided as defined by the AJCC, both 5-year OS and CSS were not significantly different between the N2a and internal-LPLN groups (OS: 45% vs 45%, P = 0.9585; CSS: 51% vs 49%, P = 0.5742), and the N2b and external-LPLN groups (OS: 32% vs 29%, P = 0.3342; CSS: 37% vs 34%, P = 0.4347). OS and CSS were significantly better in the external-LPLN group than in stage IV patients who underwent curative resection (OS: 29% vs 24%, P = 0.0240; CSS: 34% vs 27%, P = 0.0117). Conclusions: Lateral pelvic LNs can be considered as regional LNs in low rectal cancer, although metastasis extending beyond the internal iliac area is associated with poorer survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available