Journal
RADIOLOGY
Volume 239, Issue 1, Pages 246-254Publisher
RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2391050221
Keywords
-
Funding
- NCI NIH HHS [5T32 CA 09502] Funding Source: Medline
- NCRR NIH HHS [P41 RR 14075, R01 RR 16594-01A1, U24 RR 021382] Funding Source: Medline
- NIBIB NIH HHS [R01 EB 001550, R21 EB 02530] Funding Source: Medline
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board and was in full compliance with HIPAA guidelines. Informed consent, was obtained from all patients. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare intra- and intersubject variability of manual versus antomatic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging section prescription. In two examinations, T2-weighted series were acquired with both methods. All intrasubject and three of six intersubject section prescription variances were significantly higher for manual prescription (P <.01). Root mean square errors confirmed better coregistration of the automated approach (P <.001). Automatic section prescription leads to improved reproducibility of imaging orientations for intra- and intersubject series in clinical practice. (c) RSNA, 2006.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available