4.4 Review

Strategies for prevention of nosocomial sepsis in the neonatal intensive care unit

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN PEDIATRICS
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 101-106

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.mop.0000193300.25141.c5

Keywords

central venous catheter; fluconazole; neonate; probiotics; sepsis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Infants hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit, particularly preterm infants, have very high rates of nosocomial sepsis (also referred to as late onset sepsis or healthcare-associated sepsis). Today's preventive strategies for nosocomial sepsis focus on augmenting the immunologic and functional immaturities of premature infants and ameliorating the risks of extrinsic factors by the use of prophylactic antibiotics and best clinical practices. Recent findings Topical emollients improved neonatal skin condition, but were associated with an increased risk of nosecomial bacterial sepsis and coagulase negative staphylococcal infections, and thus should not be used in extremely-lowbirth-weight infants. Single-center studies have shown that probiotics containing anaerobic bacteria may reduce the rate of necrotizing enterocolitis, the severity of necrotizing enterocolitis, and/or bacterial sepsis. Single-center studies have shown that prophylactic fluconazole reduces the rates of invasive candidiasis and/or colonization of extremely-lowbirth-weight infants, Quality improvement projects to improve adherence to appropriate hand hygiene and best practices for central venous catheter insertion and maintenance can reduce rates of nosocomial sepsis. Summary The safety and efficacy of probiotics and prophylactic fluconazole require large multicenter trials. Quality improvement initiatives, however, can be performed now and can reduce the rates of nosocomial sepsis in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available