4.7 Article

Selective Diaphragm Muscle Weakness After Contractile Inactivity During Thoracic Surgery

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGERY
Volume 254, Issue 6, Pages 1044-1049

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318232e75b

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [VENI 016.096.043, VIDI 917.96.306]
  2. European Respiratory Society [MC 1120-2009]
  3. EU

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale: Postoperative pulmonary complications are significant contributors to morbidity in patients who have undergone upper abdominal, thoracic, or cardiac surgery. The pathophysiology of these complications might involve postoperative inspiratory muscle weakness. The nature of postoperative inspiratory muscle weakness is unknown. Objective: To investigate the effect of surgery on the functioning of the diaphragm, the main muscle of inspiration. Methods: Serial biopsies from the diaphragm and the latissimus dorsi muscle were obtained from 6 patients during thoracotomy for resection of a tumor in the right lung. Biopsies were taken as soon as the diaphragm had been exposed (t(0)) and again after 2 hours (t(2)). The contractile performance of demembranated muscle fibers, as well as fiber morphology and markers for proteolysis, was determined. Results: In all patients, the force-generating capacity of diaphragm muscle fibers at t(2) was significantly reduced (similar to 35%) compared with that at t(0), with a more pronounced force loss in type 2 fibers compared with type 1 fibers. Diaphragm weakness was not part of a generalized muscle weakness as contractile performance of latissimus dorsi fibers was preserved at t(2). Diaphragm fiber size and myofibrillar structure were not different at t(2) compared with t0, but myosin heavy chain type 2 was significantly reduced at t(2) and MuRF-1 mRNA and protein levels were elevated at t(2). Conclusions: Only 2 hours of thoracic surgery causes marked, and selective, diaphragm muscle fiber weakness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available