Journal
AQUATIC BOTANY
Volume 84, Issue 3, Pages 233-238Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2005.10.003
Keywords
clonal; crowding; gigartinales; Mastocarpus; petrocelidaceae; self-thinning; size inequality
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Fronds from crowded stands of clonal seaweeds, particularly those in which holdfasts are mostly perennial and are the major source of new fronds every year, are thought not to undergo self-thinning during the growth season, unlike those from crowded stands of unitary seaweeds. For clonal seaweeds, it is not known, however, what happens at the very end of the growth season, when crowding is highest for the year. By sampling twice more frequently than previously done for similar species, the possible occurrence of frond self-thinning was tested for Mastocarpus papillatus (Rhodophyta, Gigartinales, Petrocelidaceae) from western Canada during the growth season (spring) of 2003. Initially, stand biomass increased together with frond density, as found previously for similar clonal seaweeds. Shortly before stand biomass peaked for the year (June), frond density remained statistically unchanged. Thus, the increased sampling precision of this study confirms that fronds of these clonal seaweeds do not undergo self-thinning, not even shortly before crowding is highest. Frond size inequality for M. palillatus remained statistically similar during the growth season, which is also consistent with a model of no self-thinning. There are similarities in biomass-density dynamics and in size inequality dynamics between clonal seaweeds and clonal vascular plants. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available