4.3 Article

Risk of clozapine-associated agranulocytosis and mandatory white blood cell monitoring

Journal

ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages 683-688

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1345/aph.1G396

Keywords

agranulocytosis; clozapine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To provide information for physicians and patients on which to base a decision as to whether to stop mandatory blood testing. DATA SOURCES: Articles on drug-induced blood dyscrasias were identified by searches of MEDLINE (1966-September 2005) and review of their bibliographies. Novartis was asked to provide additional data on clozapine, leukopenia, agranulocytosis, and suicidality. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Data on the chance of clozapine-induced leukopenia and agranulocytosis were combined with data about possible fatality and compared with the risks associated with other medications and with life in general. DATA SYNTHESIS: The chance of clozapine-induced leukopenia or agranulocytosis decreases exponentially over time. In the US, the chance in the second 6 months of treatment is 0.70/1000 patient-years and, after the first year, 0.39/1000 patient-years. The case fatality rate of clozapine-induced agranulocytosis is estimated as 4.2-16%, depending on whether a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is used. Nevertheless, treatment with clozapine reduces overall mortality, probably because it reduces suicidality. CONCLUSIONS: After at least 6 months' treatment with clozapine, the mortality involved in stopping white blood cell monitoring is about the same as the mortality associated with other medications, such as mianserin or phenylbutazone, and with life in general (traffic or occupational accident). If the patient has been well informed and wishes to stop the monitoring, it is a medically justifiable option to do so and is preferable to stopping treatment with clozapine since this drug reduces overall mortality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available