4.6 Article

EGFR mutations in patients with brain metastases from lung cancer:: Association with the efficacy of gefitinib

Journal

NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 137-144

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1215/15228517-2005-002

Keywords

brain metastases; EGFR; gefitinib; mutation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gefitinib-a specific inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-associated tyrosine kinase-has demonstrated efficacy in a subgroup of patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) who fall conventional chemotherapy. It is also reported to have an antitumor effect in brain metastases from NSCLC. Additionally, EGFR mutations have shown a strong association with gefitinib sensitivity for NSCLC. Here, we assessed the efficacy of gefitinib in brain metastases from NSCLC and evaluated the association of this efficacy with EGFR mutations. We retrospectively reviewed eight cases in which patients were suffering from brain metastases before the initiation of gefitinib treatment. Brain tumor response could be evaluated by MRI in these patients; EGFR gene analyses were also available. We evaluated whether objective tumor response was observed after gefitinib treatment and assessed the efficacy of gefitinib as effective, noneffective, or not assessable in consideration of the influence of previous radiotherapy. Of the eight patients, the efficacy of gefitinib was assessed as effective in three and as noneffective in three. All three patients demonstrating effective efficacy had EGFR mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain (deletion mutation in two patients and point mutation in one patients), whereas none of the three patients demonstrating noneffective efficacy had EGFR mutations. Gefitinib appears to be effective in treating brain metastases in a subgroup of patients. Our data suggested a possible association between the efficacy of gefitinib in the treatment of brain metastases and EGFR mutations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available