4.5 Article

Tribute to R.G.!Boutilier:: The effect of size on the physiological and behavioural responses of oscar, Astronotus ocellatus, to hypoxia

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 209, Issue 7, Pages 1197-1205

Publisher

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02090

Keywords

oxygen; Amazon; predation; social; aquatic surface respiration (ASR); oscar; Astronotus ocellatus

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The physiological and behavioural responses of two size groups of oscar (Astronotus ocellatus) to hypoxia were studied. The physiological responses were tested by measuring (M) over dot(O2) during decreasing environmental oxygen tensions. Larger oscars were better able to maintain oxygen consumption during a decrease in P(O2), regulating routine (M) over dot(O2) to a significantly lower P(O2) threshold (50 mmHg) than smaller oscars (70 mmHg). Previous studies have also demonstrated a longer survival time of large oscars exposed to extreme hypoxia, coupled with a greater anaerobic enzymatic capability. Large oscars began aquatic surface respiration (ASR) at the oxygen tension at which the first significant decrease in (M) over dot(O2) was seen (50 mmHg). Interestingly, smaller oscars postponed ASR to around 22 mmHg, well beyond the P(O2) at which they switched from oxyregulation to oxyconformation. Additionally, when given the choice between an hypoxic environment containing aquatic macrophyte shelter and an open normoxic environment, small fish showed a greater preference for the hypoxic environment. Thus shelter from predators appears particularly important for juveniles, who may accept a greater physiological compromise in exchange for safety. In response to hypoxia without available shelter, larger fish reduced their level of activity (with the exception of aggressive encounters) to aid metabolic suppression whereas smaller oscars increased their activity, with the potential benefit of finding oxygen-rich areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available