4.4 Article

Reduced protective efficacy of a blood-stage malaria vaccine by concurrent nematode infection

Journal

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
Volume 74, Issue 4, Pages 2138-2144

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.74.4.2138-2144.2006

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI054806, R21 AI054806] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Helminth infections, which are prevalent in areas where malaria is endemic, have been shown to modulate immune responses to unrelated pathogens and have been implicated in poor efficacy of malaria vaccines in humans. We established a murine coinfection model involving blood-stage Plasmodium chabaudi AS malaria and a gastrointestinal nematode, Heligmosomoides polygyrus, to investigate the impact of nematode infection on the protective efficacy of a malaria vaccine. C57BL/6 mice immunized with crude blood-stage P. chabaudi AS antigen in TiterMax adjuvant developed strong protection against malaria challenge. The same immunization protocol failed to induce strong protection in H. polygyrus-infected mice. Immunized nematode-infected mice produced significantly lower levels of malaria-specific antibody than nematode-free mice produced. In response to nematode and malarial antigens, spleen cells from immunized nematode-infected mice produced significantly lower levels of gamma interferon but more interieukin-4 (IL-4), IL-13, and IL-10 in vitro than spleen cells from immunized nematode-free mice produced. Furthermore, H. polygyrus infection also induced a strong transforming growth factor beta 1 response in vivo and in vitro. Deworming treatment of H. polygyrus-infected mice before antimalarial immunization, but not deworming treatment after antimalarial immunization, restored the protective immunity to malaria challenge. These results demonstrate that concurrent nematode infection strongly modulates immune responses induced by an experimental malaria vaccine and consequently suppresses the protective efficacy of the vaccine against malaria challenge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available