4.1 Article

A double-blind comparison of galantamine hydrogen bromide and placebo in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder - A pilot study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 163-166

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000204139.20417.8a

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Galantamine hydrogen bromide (HBr) is a competitive and reversible inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase. Because of its cholinergic nicotinic mechanism of action, galantamine HBr was hypothesized to have therapeutic activity in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Method: We conducted a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial using daily doses of up to 24mg/d of galantamine HBr in the treatment of adults who met full Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Alental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria for ADHD with childhood-onset and persistent adult symptoms. All analyses were intention to treat with the last observation carried forward for subjects who did not complete the full study schedule. Results: The mean daily doses at week 12 were 19.8 6.4 mg for galantarnine HBr and 21.8 +/- 4.6 mg for placebo (P = 0.3). There was no statistically or clinically significant greater reduction in ADHD symptoms in subjects treated with galantamine HBr relative to those receiving placebo (P = 0.5). Using last observation carried forward, 4 (22%), of 18 patients receiving galantamine HBr were considered responders (much or very much improved on the Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale and at least a 30% reduction on the ADHD Investigator Symptom Report Scale compared with 11% [2/18] on placebo; P = 0.4). Conclusion: These results do not support the clinical utility of galantamine HBr in the treatment of ADHD at the doses used in this pilot study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available