4.7 Article

The eclipsing binary V1061 Cygni: Confronting stellar evolution models for active and inactive solar-type stars

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 640, Issue 2, Pages 1018-1038

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/500188

Keywords

binaries : close; binaries : spectroscopic; stars : evolution; stars : individual (V1061 Cyg); techniques : spectroscopic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present spectroscopic and photometric observations of the eclipsing system V1061 Cyg (P = 2.35 days). A third star is visible in the spectrum, and the system is a hierarchical triple. We combine the radial velocities for the three stars, times of eclipse, and intermediate astrometric data from the Hipparcos mission (abscissa residuals) to establish the elements of the outer orbit, which is eccentric and has a period of 15.8 yr. We determine accurate values for the masses, radii, and effective temperatures of the binary components: M-Aa = 1.282 +/- 0.015 M-circle dot, R-Aa = 1.615 +/- 0.017 R-circle dot, and T-eff(Aa) = 6180 +/- 100 K for the primary (star Aa), and M-Ab = 0.9315 +/- 0.0068 M-circle dot, R-Ab = 0.974 +/- 0.020 R-circle dot, and T-eff(Ab) = 5300 +/- 150 K for the secondary (Ab). The mass of the tertiary is determined to be M-B = 0.925 +/- 0.036 M-circle dot and its effective temperature is T-eff(B) = 5670 +/- 150 K. Current stellar evolution models agree well with the properties of the primary but show a very large discrepancy in the radius of the secondary, in the sense that the predicted values are similar to 10% smaller than observed (a similar to 5 sigma effect). In addition, the temperature is cooler than predicted, by some 200 K. These discrepancies are quite remarkable given that the star is only 7% less massive than the Sun, the calibration point of all stellar models. We identify the chromospheric activity as the likely cause of the effect. Inactive stars agree very well with the models, while active ones such as V1061 Cyg Ab appear systematically too large and too cool.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available