4.7 Article

Results of pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with periampullary adenocarcinoma - Perineural growth more important prognostic factor than tumor localization

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGERY
Volume 248, Issue 1, Pages 97-103

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817b6609

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To study the impact of perineural growth as a prognostic factor in periampullary adenocarcinorna (pancreatic head, ampulla of Vater, distal bile duct, and duodenal carcinoma). Summary Background Data: Pancreatic head carcinoma is considered to have the worst prognosis of the periampullary carcinomas. Several other prognostic factors for periampullary tumors have been identified, eg, lyrnph node status, free resection margins, tumor size and differentiation, and vascular invasion. The impact of perineural growth as a prognostic factor in relation to the site of origin of periampullary carcinomas is unknown. Methods: Data of 205 patients with periampullary carcinomas were retrieved from our prospective database. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in 121 patients. Their clinicopathological data were reviewed and analyzed in a multivariate analysis. Results: Perineural growth was present in 49% of the cases (37 of the 5 1 patients with pancreatic head carcinoma; 7 of the 30 patients with ampulla of Vater carcinoma; 7 of the 19 with distal bile duct carcinoma,- and 8 of the 21 with duodenal carcinoma). Overall 5-year survival was 32.6% with a median survival of 20.7 months. Median Survival in tumors with perineural growth was 13.1 months compared with 36.0 months in tumors without perineural growth (P < 0.0001) Using multivariate analysis, the following unfavorable prognostic factors were identified: perineural growth (RR = 2.90, 95% CI 1.62-5.22), nonradical resection (RR = 2.28, 95% Cl 1.19-4.36), positive lymph nodes (RR = 1.96, 95% CI 1. 11-3.45), and angioinvasion (RR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.05-3.06). Portal or superior mesenteric vein reconstruction and tumor localization were not of statistical significance. Conclusion: Perineural growth is a more important risk factor for survival than the primary site of periampullary carcinomas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available