4.7 Article

Influence of muscle type on rheological properties of porcine myofibrillar protein during heat-induced gelation

Journal

MEAT SCIENCE
Volume 72, Issue 4, Pages 697-703

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.09.021

Keywords

heat-induced gelation; myofibrillar protein; muscle type; pH; rheology; water-holding capacity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The gelation characteristics of myofibrillar proteins are indicative of meat product texture. Defining the performance of myofibrillar proteins during gelation is beneficial in maintaining quality and developing processed meat products and processes. This study investigates the impact of pH on viscoelastic properties of porcine myofibrillar proteins prepared from different muscles (semimembranosus (SM), longissimus dorsi (LD) and psoas major (PM)) during heat-induced gelation. Dynamic rheological properties were measured while heating at 1 degrees C/min from 20 to 85 degrees C, followed by a holding phase at 85 degrees C for 3 min and a cooling phase from 85 to 5 degrees C at a rate of 5 degrees C/min. Storage modulus (G', the elastic response of the gelling material) increased as gel formation occurred, but decreased after reaching the temperature of myosin denaturation (52 degrees C) until approximately 60 degrees C when the gel strength increased again. This resulted in a peak and depression in the thermogram. Following 60 degrees C, the treatments maintained observed trends in gel strength, showing SM myofibrils produced the strongest gels. Myofibrillar protein from SM and PM formed stronger gels at pH 6.0 than at pH 6.5. Differences may be attributed to subtle variations in their protein profile related to muscle type or postmortem metabolism. Significant correlations were determined between G' at 57, 72, 85 and 5 degrees C, indicating that changes affecting gel strength took effect prior to 57 degrees C. Muscle type was found to influence water-holding capacity to a greater degree than pH. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available