4.6 Article

SPARSE PCA: OPTIMAL RATES AND ADAPTIVE ESTIMATION

Journal

ANNALS OF STATISTICS
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages 3074-3110

Publisher

INST MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS
DOI: 10.1214/13-AOS1178

Keywords

Adaptive estimation; aggregation; covariance matrix; eigenvector; group sparsity; low-rank matrix; minimax lower bound; optimal rate of convergence; principal component analysis; thresholding

Funding

  1. NSF FRG [DMS-08-54973]
  2. NSF [DMS-12-08982]
  3. NIH [R01 CA 127334-05]
  4. Dean's Research Fund of the Wharton School
  5. Division Of Mathematical Sciences
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1208982] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Principal component analysis (PCA) is one of the most commonly used statistical procedures with a wide range of applications. This paper considers both minimax and adaptive estimation of the principal subspace in the high dimensional setting. Under mild technical conditions, we first establish the optimal rates of convergence for estimating the principal subspace which are sharp with respect to all the parameters, thus providing a complete characterization of the difficulty of the estimation problem in term of the convergence rate. The lower bound is obtained by calculating the local metric entropy and an application of Fano's lemma. The rate optimal estimator is constructed using aggregation, which, however, might not be computationally feasible. We then introduce an adaptive procedure for estimating the principal subspace which is fully data driven and can be computed efficiently. It is shown that the estimator attains the optimal rates of convergence simultaneously over a large collection of the parameter spaces. A key idea in our construction is a reduction scheme which reduces the sparse PCA problem to a high-dimensional multivariate regression problem. This method is potentially also useful for other related problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available