4.6 Article

ESTIMATION OF (NEAR) LOW-RANK MATRICES WITH NOISE AND HIGH-DIMENSIONAL SCALING

Journal

ANNALS OF STATISTICS
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 1069-1097

Publisher

INST MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS
DOI: 10.1214/10-AOS850

Keywords

High-dimensional inference; rank constraints; nuclear norm; trace norm; M-estimators; random matrix theory

Funding

  1. Sloan Foundation Fellowship [AFOSR-09NL184]
  2. NSF [CDI-0941742, DMS-09-07632]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0907632] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [0907632] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study an instance of high-dimensional inference in which the goal is to estimate a matrix circle minus* is an element of R-m1xm2 on the basis of N noisy observations. The unknown matrix circle minus* is assumed to be either exactly low rank, or near low-rank, meaning that it can be well-approximated by a matrix with low rank. We consider a standard M-estimator based on regularization by the nuclear or trace norm over matrices, and analyze its performance under high-dimensional scaling. We define the notion of restricted strong convexity (RSC) for the loss function, and use it to derive nonasymptotic bounds on the Frobenius norm error that hold for a general class of noisy observation models, and apply to both exactly low-rank and approximately low rank matrices. We then illustrate consequences of this general theory for a number of specific matrix models, including low-rank multivariate or multi-task regression, system identification in vector autoregressive processes and recovery of low-rank matrices from random projections. These results involve nonasymptotic random matrix theory to establish that the RSC condition holds, and to determine an appropriate choice of regularization parameter. Simulation results show excellent agreement with the high-dimensional scaling of the error predicted by our theory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available