4.6 Article

THE SPARSE LAPLACIAN SHRINKAGE ESTIMATOR FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL REGRESSION

Journal

ANNALS OF STATISTICS
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 2021-2046

Publisher

INST MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS
DOI: 10.1214/11-AOS897

Keywords

Graphical structure; minimax concave penalty; penalized regression; high-dimensional data; variable selection; oracle property

Funding

  1. NIH [R01CA120988, R01CA142774, R03LM009754, R03LM009828, R01ES009911, R01CA127334]
  2. NSF [DMS-08-05670, DMS-06-04571, DMS-08-04626]
  3. NSA [MDS 904-02-1-0063]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [0906420, 0805670] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1106753] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose a new penalized method for variable selection and estimation that explicitly incorporates the correlation patterns among predictors. This method is based on a combination of the minimax concave penalty and Laplacian quadratic associated with a graph as the penalty function. We call it the sparse Laplacian shrinkage (SLS) method. The SLS uses the minimax concave penalty for encouraging sparsity and Laplacian quadratic penalty for promoting smoothness among coefficients associated with the correlated predictors. The SLS has a generalized grouping property with respect to the graph represented by the Laplacian quadratic. We show that the SLS possesses an oracle property in the sense that it is selection consistent and equal to the oracle Laplacian shrinkage estimator with high probability. This result holds in sparse, high-dimensional settings with p >> n under reasonable conditions. We derive a coordinate descent algorithm for computing the SLS estimates. Simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the performance of the SLS method and a real data example is used to illustrate its application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available