4.4 Article

An equivalent domain integral method for fracture analysis of functionally graded materials under thermal stresses

Journal

JOURNAL OF THERMAL STRESSES
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 371-397

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01495730500499175

Keywords

functionally graded materials; thermal stresses; equivalent domain integral; stress intensity factors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the formulation and finite element implementation of the equivalent domain integral (EDI) for fracture analysis of functionally graded materials (FGMs) under thermal stresses. By carrying out the neccesary modifications resulting from material nonhomogeneity and thermal strains, the generalized J-integral is converted to an equivalent domain integral around the crack tip for both plane stress and plane strain problems of thermoelasticity. The developed procedure is integrated in a fracture analysis code FRAC2D using graded and cubic finite elements in order to calculate the stress intensity factor undermode I steady-state and transient thermal loading conditions. Temperature distribution profiles in FGMs are calculated using the finite elements based heat transfer analysis code HEAT2D. Comparisons of the computed thermal stress intensity factors to the results available in the literature and to those calculated by an enriched finite element method show that developed EDI approach produces highly accurate results and possesses the required domain independence. Detailed parametric analyses are performed in order to examine the influences of material property variation profiles and geometrical parameters on the mode I stress intensity factors. It is shown that variation profiles of the thermomechanical parameters such as Poisson's ratio, thermal expansion coefficient and thermal conductivity significantly influence both the amplitude of the stress intensity factors and the transient crack closure behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available