4.3 Article

Bicuspid aortic valve: an innocent finding or a potentially life-threatening anomaly whose complications may be elicited by sports activity?

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 282-287

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.2459/01.JCM.0000219322.04881.9e

Keywords

aorta; sports eligibility; bicuspid; aortic dilation; aortic dissection; ectasia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The bicuspid aortic valve is the most frequent congenital anomaly of the heart in adults. Since the 1970s, with the advent of two-dimensional echocardiography, the in-vivo diagnosis of bicuspid aortic valve has become easier and greater attention has been paid to this anomaly in normal young people, particularly in sportsmen because, from a theoretical point of view, physical exercise may stress the abnormal aortic valve, favouring an early deterioration of the valve itself, as well as a dilation of the ascending aorta. Although the bicuspid aortic valve may remain without clinical consequences for a lifetime, it may be responsible for severe complications such as aortic stenosis, aortic insufficiency, endocarditis and aortic dilation/dissection, sometimes requiring surgery. Moreover, the bicuspid aortic valve may be associated with other cardiovascular anomalies, mainly aortic coarctation. At present there are no prospective studies dealing with effect of physical training and competitive sports on the natural course of the bicuspid aortic valve. However, in order to take any decision about sports eligibility, sports physicians should perform an initial accurate staging of the bicuspid aortic valve, taking into account haemodynamic factors, aortic complications and associated significant cardiovascular anomalies. A strict follow-up, with serial cardiological controls, is mandatory as well as antibiotic prophylaxis for endocarditis, particularly in subjects engaged in contact sports. J Cardiovasc Med 7:282-287 (C) 2006 Italian Federation of Cardiology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available