4.5 Article

Magnetic properties of the ordered double perovskite Sr2MnTeO6

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume -, Issue 7, Pages 1362-1370

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.200500880

Keywords

perovskite phases; magnetic structure; EPR spectroscopy; neutron diffraction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ordered double perovskite Sr2MnTeO6 was prepared by the freeze-drying method. The nuclear and magnetic structures were determined by both X-ray and neutron (D2B and D1B) powder diffraction. A distorted, double perovskite structure type described by the monoclinic P12(1)/n1 space group is observed at room temperature and down to 4 K. The room temperature EPR spectrum shows an isotropic signal centered at a g value of 1.998 indicating that manganese ions are in the +2 oxidation state. At low temperature the EPR signal broadens as the exchange and dipolar interactions between Mn2+ cations increase. Below 25 K no signal is observed, indicating that the sample is magnetically ordered. The dc magnetic susceptibility shows the existence of antiferromagnetic interactions with an ordering temperature around 20 K. A sharp lambda-type anomaly observed at 19 K in the specific heat curve and refinement of low-temperature neutron diffraction data confirm the presence of a three-dimensional, antiferromagnetic ordered structure with an ordering temperature of ca. 23 K. The propagation vector of the magnetic structure is k = [0,0,0], yielding a type I antiferromagnetic ordering between Mn2+ (S = 5/2) cations. At 2 K, each manganese ion is antiferromagnetically aligned to 8 out of 12 nearest-neighbors at an approximate distance of 5.6 angstrom. This magnetic structure can be viewed as being composed of ferromagnetic arrangement of Mn2+ moments in the ab plane, coupled antiferromagnetically along the c axis. ((c) Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2006).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available