4.8 Article

Suppression of natural killer cell-mediated bone marrow cell rejection by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0509249103

Keywords

anti-CD25; bone marrow transplantation; hybrid resistance; Foxp3

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [T32 CA009563, T32 CA 09563, R01 CA093527, R01 CA 93527] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [RR 11576, P20 RR 016464, R01 RR011576, P20 RR016464] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL063452, R37 HL056067, R01 HL 63452, 2R37 HL 56067] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI034495, R01 AI046689, R01 AI 34495, AI 46689] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Naturally occurring CD4(+)CD25(+) T regulatory (Treg) cells have been shown to inhibit adaptive responses by T cells. Natural killer (NK) cells represent an important component of innate immunity in both cancer and infectious disease states. We investigated whether CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg cells could affect NK cell function in vivo by using allogeneic (full H2-disparate) bone marrow (BM) transplantation and the model of hybrid resistance, in which parental marrow grafts are rejected solely by the NK cells of irradiated (BALB/c x C57BL/6) F-1 recipients. We demonstrate that the prior removal of host Treg cells, but not CD8(+) T cells, significantly enhanced NK cell-mediated BM rejection in both models. The inhibitory role of Treg cells on NK cells was confirmed in vivo with adoptive transfer studies in which transferred CD4(+)CD25(+) cells could abrogate NK cell-mediated hybrid resistance. Anti-TGF-beta mAb treatment also increased NK cell-mediated BM graft rejection, suggesting that the NK cell suppression is exerted through TGF-beta. Thus, CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg cells can potently inhibit NK cell function in vivo, and their depletion may have therapeutic ramifications for NK cell function in BM transplantation and cancer therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available