4.4 Article

NFATc1 expression in the developing heart valves is responsive to the RANKL pathway and is required for endocardial expression of cathepsin K

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 292, Issue 2, Pages 407-417

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.01.017

Keywords

NFATc1; RANKL; cathepsin K; heart valve

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P50-HL074728] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NFATc1 is necessary for remodeling endocardial cushions into mature heart valve leaflets and is also an essential effector of receptor activator of NF kappa B ligand (RANKL) signaling required for transcriptional activation of bone matrix remodeling enzymes during osteoclast differentiation. Therefore, developing heart valves were examined to determine if NFATc1 functions in the RANKL pathway during leaflet remodeling. Key components of RANKL signal transduction including RANKL, its receptor RANK, and the downstream remodeling enzyme cathepsin K (Ctsk) are expressed in the heart during valve remodeling and colocalize with NFATc1 in developing valve endocardium. However, the absence of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) activity and the lack of F4/80-positive macrophage lineage contribution to the remodeling valves demonstrate that certain aspects of osteoclast RANKL function are not shared during valve formation. Analysis of NFATc1(-/-) mouse embryos shows that NFATc1 is specifically required for endocardial expression of RANKL and Ctsk during valve fort-nation. In addition, RANKL treatment augments expression of NFATc1 and Ctsk in embryonic heart cultures, and the RANKL-mediated increase in Ctsk expression is dependent oil NFATc1. Together, these results support a role for RANKL signaling during heart valve development and suggest that valve leaflet morphogenesis involves NFATc1-dependent expression of remodeling enzymes including Ctsk. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available