4.7 Article

The study using wild-type and Ogg1 knockout mice exposed to potassium bromate shows no tumor induction despite an extensive accumulation of 8-hydroxyguanine in kidney DNA

Journal

TOXICOLOGY
Volume 221, Issue 2-3, Pages 179-186

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2006.01.004

Keywords

potassium bromate (KBrO(3)); Ogg1 knockout mice; 8-hydroxyguanine (8-OH-G); 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG); chronic exposure; carcinogenesis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to assess the effect of potassium bromate (KBrO(3)) on the induction of tumor formation, a 1-year carcinogenesis study was performed using Oggl knockout mice (Oggl(-/-)) and wild-type mice (Oggl(+/+)). The mice were chronically exposed to KBrO(3) by putting it in the drinking water for 29 weeks, at 2 g/l for the first 18 weeks, and then at 1 g/l for another 11 weeks. After termination of treatment the mice were kept for an additional 23 weeks. The amount of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG) in kidney DNA after 29 weeks of KBrO(3) exposure reached 500 8-OH-dG/10(6) dG, almost 250-fold that of untreated wild-type mice. During the course of study the mice appeared normal, although a decrease of body weight gain in both Oggl(-/-) and Oggl(+/+) mice exposed to KBrO(3), and some kidney malfunction in KBrO(3) treated Oggl(-/-) mice was observed. Surprisingly, when Oggl(-/-) and Oggl(+/+) mice were sacrificed at 52 weeks, no tumor formation could be found in kidney or other organs such as lung, liver, spleen, thymus, stomach and intestine. Microscopic examination also showed the absence of precancerous foci in all tissues of both Oggl(-/-) and Oggl(+/+) mice. A possible explanation is presented to reconcile these results with those of others which showed an increased incidence of tumor formation in untreated Oggl(-/-) mice. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available