4.7 Article

Reproducibility of chronic and acute infarct size measurement by delayed enhancement-magnetic resonance imaging

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 8, Pages 1641-1645

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.065

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of acute and chronic infarct size (IS) by delayed enhancement (DE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). BACKGROUND Infarct size measurements can be used as Surrogate end point to reduce the sample size in studies comparing different reperfusion strategies in myocardial infarction (MI). Delayed enhancement MRI is a rather new technique, and so far infarct IS reproducibility has not been established appropriately. METHODS In 21 patients (10 acute MI and 11 chronic MI), IS was assessed repeatedly on consecutive days by DE-MRI. Reproducibility, interobserver, and intraobserver variabilities were assessed and compared by the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS Acute and chronic IS were 17.1 +/- 19.6% (range 5.1% to 69.8%) of LV mass (%LV) and 16.9 +/- 9.9 %LV (range 2.0% to 36.0%), respectively. Infarct size difference (bias) between scan I and scan 11 was -0.5 %LV, and limits of agreement were +/- 2.4 %LV. Mean bias (-0.7 %LV) and limits of agreement (+/- 3.2%) were slightly higher for acute in comparison with chronic MI with -0.4 +/- 1.3 %LV. Intraobserver and interobserver variability was low with a mean bias of 0.3 %LV (limits of agreement +/- 1.7 %LV) and -0.7 %LV (limits of agreement +/- 2.2 %LV), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Infarct size measurement by DE-MRI is an excellent tool for IS assessment, owing to its excellent repeatability in chronic and acute MI. It has therefore the potential to serve as a surrogate end point to uncover advantages of new reperfusion strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available