4.8 Article

Defocused orientation and position imaging (DOPI) of myosin V

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507134103

Keywords

3D orientation; lever arm; single molecule; fluorescence imaging with one-nanometer accuracy

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [R29 AR044420, AR26846, R01 AR044420, R01 AR026846, R37 AR026846, AR44420] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM68625, R01 GM068625] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The centroid of a fluorophore can be determined within approximate to 1.5-nm accuracy from its focused image through fluorescence imaging with one-nanometer accuracy (FIONA). if, instead, the sample is moved away from the focus, the point-spread-function depends on both the position and 3D orientation of the fluorophore, which can be calculated by defocused orientation and position imaging (DOPI). DOPI does not always yield position accurately, but it is possible to switch back and forth between focused and defocused imaging, thereby getting the centroid and the orientation with precision. We have measured the 3D orientation and stepping behavior of single bifunctional rhodamine probes attached to one of the calmodulins of the light-chain domain (LCD) of myosin V as myosin V moves along actin. Concomitant with large and small steps, the LCD rotates and then dwells in the leading and trailing position, respectively. The probe angle relative to the barbed end of the actin (beta) averaged 128 degrees while the LCD was in the leading state and 57 degrees in the trailing state. The angular difference of 71 degrees represents rotation of LCD around the bound motor domain and is consistent with a 37-nm forward step size of myosin V. When P changes, the probe rotates :+/- 27 degrees azimuthally around actin and then rotates back again on the next step. Our results remove degeneracy in angles and the appearance of nontilting lever arms that were reported.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available