4.5 Article

Molecular depth profiling with cluster ion beams

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
Volume 110, Issue 16, Pages 8329-8336

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp0573341

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Peptide-doped trehalose thin films have been characterized by bombardment with energetic cluster ion beams of C-60(+) and Au-x(+) (x = 1, 2, 3). The aim of these studies is to acquire information about the molecular sputtering process of the peptide and trehalose by measurement of secondary ion mass spectra during erosion. This system is important since uniform thin films of similar to 300 nm thickness can be reproducibly prepared on a Si Substrate, allowing detailed characterization of the resulting depth profile with different projectiles. The basic form of the molecular ion intensity as a function of ion dose is described by a simple analytical model. The model includes parameters such as the molecular sputtering yield, the damage cross section of the trehalose or the peptide, and the thickness of a surface layer altered by the projectile. The results show that favorable conditions for successful molecular depth profiling are achieved when the total sputtering yield is high and the altered layer thickness is low. Successful molecular depth profiles are achieved with all of the cluster projectiles, although the degree of chemical damage accumulation was slightly lower with C-60. With C-60 bombardment, the altered layer thickness of about 20 nm and the damage cross section of about 5 nm(2) are physically consistent with predictions of molecular dynamics calculations available for similar chemical systems. In general, the model presented should provide guidance in optimizing experimental parameters for maximizing the information content of molecular depth profiling experiments with complex molecular thin film substrates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available