3.9 Article

Missing organic carbon in Eocene marine sediments: Is metabolism the biological feedback that maintains end-member climates?

Journal

PALEOCEANOGRAPHY
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2005PA001230

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ocean chemistry is affected by pCO(2) in the atmosphere by increasing the dissolution of solid calcium carbonate and elevating the dissolved inorganic carbon concentrations in seawater. Positive feedbacks between the ocean and atmosphere can maintain high atmospheric pCO(2) and affect global climate. We report evidence for changes in the oceanic carbon cycle from the first high-quality organic carbon (C-org) data set of Eocene sediments beneath the equatorial Pacific upwelling region (Leg 199 of the Ocean Drilling Program). Eocene C-org mass accumulation rates (MARs) are 10 times lower than Holocene rates, even though expected C-org MARs estimated from biogenic-barium MARs (an indicator of biological production) equal or exceed modern fluxes. What happened to the missing C-org? Recent advances in ecology and biochemical kinetics show that the metabolism of nearly all animals, marine and terrestrial, is positively correlated by first principles to environmental temperatures. The approximately 10 degrees C abyssal temperature difference from Eocene to Holocene should have radically reduced pelagic C-org burial, as we observe. We propose that higher basal metabolism and nutrient utilization/recycling rates in the Eocene water column and surface sediments precluded C-org sediment burial in the pelagic ocean. Increased rates of metabolism, nutrient utilization, and lowered C-org sedimentation caused by increased temperature may have acted as a biological feedback to maintain high atmospheric pCO(2) and hothouse climates. Conversely, these same parameters would reverse sign to maintain low pCO(2) when temperatures decrease, thereby maintaining icehouse'' conditions during cold climate regimes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available