4.7 Article

Liver tumor model with implanted rhabdomyosarcoma in rats: MR imaging, microangiography, and histopathologic analysis

Journal

RADIOLOGY
Volume 239, Issue 2, Pages 554-562

Publisher

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2392050277

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In compliance with institutional regulations for care and use of laboratory animals, the aim of this study was to establish and characterize a rodent liver tumor model to provide a platform for preclinical assessment of new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. A rhabdomyosarcoma tumor was implanted in the right and left liver lobes of 20 rats, for a total of 40 tumors. T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images, diffusion-weighted images, and dynamic susceptibility contrast agent-enhanced perfusion-weighted images were obtained up to 16 days after tumor implantation and were compared with postmortem three-dimensional computed tomographic (CT) images, digital microangiograms, and histopathologic findings. Fifteen tumors were examined with proton (H-1) MR spectroscopy. All tumors grew, with a mean volume doubling time of 2.2 days +/- 0.9 ( standard deviation) and a final size of 591 mm(3) +/- 124. The rhabdomyosarcoma tumor showed hypervascularity at MR imaging, three-dimensional CT, microangiography, and histologic analysis. On dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion- weighted images, the maximum signal intensity decrease differed in time and extent between the tumor and the liver, with a significantly (P <.001) higher relative blood volume, relative blood flow, and permeability value in the tumor than in the liver. With H-1 MR spectroscopy, the rhabdomyosarcoma tumor and the liver featured significant (P <.001) choline and lipid peaks, respectively. Implantation of a rhabdomyosarcoma tumor in the livers of rats is feasible and reproducible, and this animal model seems promising for future testing of new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. (c) RSNA, 2006.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available