4.5 Review

Human natural killer cell development and biology

Journal

BLOOD REVIEWS
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 123-137

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2005.10.001

Keywords

natural killer cell; receptors; KIR; development

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Natural killer cells are important innate immune effector cells with potentially broad applications in the treatment of human malignancy due to their ability to lyse neoplastic cells without the need for tumor-specific antigen recognition. Human NK cells can be divided into two functional subsets based on their surface expression of CD56; CD56(bright) immunoregulatory cells and CD56(dim) cytotoxic cells. In addition to functional differences, these NK cell subsets can be modulated differently by interleukin (IL)-2, which has permitted the development of tower dose, better tolerated IL-2 regimens for the in vivo expansion and activation of NK cells. The importance of early hematopoietic growth factors, such as c-kit ligand and flt-3 ligand, and their synergy with IL-15 in the development of human NK cells in the bone marrow has permitted the investigation of novel cytokine combinations for optimizing in vivo expansion of NK cell in the clinic. The importance of lymph nodes as a site for NK cell development has recently been elucidated. Furthermore, progress in the field of how NK cell recognize target cells via activating and inhibitory receptors, and how the balance of signals from these receptors can modulate NK cell activity has revolutionized our understanding of the selective killing of tumor cells by NK cells white sparing normal cells. In this review, we summarize current understanding of NK cell biology, and highlight how such knowledge may be translated to optimize the efficacy of using autologous or allogeneic NK cell for the immunotherapy of cancer. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available