4.4 Article

Slow dark deactivation of Arabidopsis chloroplast ATP synthase caused by a mutation in a nonplastidic SAC domain protein

Journal

PHOTOSYNTHESIS RESEARCH
Volume 88, Issue 2, Pages 133-142

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11120-006-9041-4

Keywords

ATP synthase; SAC

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coupling factor slow recovery (cfs) is a recessive mutant of Arabidopsis with anomalous ATP synthase activation/deactivation characteristics as well as a distinct growth phenotype. The most significant feature of this mutant is that the dark-adapted deactivation of ATP synthase is a very slow relative to the wild type, indicating interference with ATP synthase regulation. Physical mapping of the mutation delimited it to a region in a pair of bacterial artificial chromosome clones. Examination of T-DNA insertion lines of all 34 putative genes located in this region identified two homozygous T-DNA insertion lines of the same gene, At3g59770, possessing phenotypes indistinguishable from the cfs mutant. At3g59770 had been previously identified as suppressor of actin 9 (SAC9), a protein with a SAC domain, a protein-protein interaction module containing two conserved tryptophans known as a WW domain, and an ATP/GTP-binding site motif A. Sequence analysis of cfs revealed a point mutation of G to A resulting in an amino acid substitution from tryptophan to STOP, thereby coding a truncated protein. Real-time-PCR amplification of the gene specific fragments showed that the T-DNA mutants did not have full-length transcripts whereas the cfs mutant transcribed a full-length mutated transcript. Further investigation of SAC9 RNA expression levels in different tissues of wild-type plants by RT-PCR revealed the highest expression in leaves. SAC 9 dysfunction interferes with ATP synthase deactivation, possibly by an alteration in phosphoinositide signaling inducing a stress mimicry response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available