4.5 Article

Detection of relapsing fever in human blood samples from Israel using PCR targeting the glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase (GlpQ) gene

Journal

ACTA TROPICA
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages 189-195

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2006.04.004

Keywords

relapsing fever; Borrelia persica; GlpQ; PCR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Relapsing fever caused by Borrelia persica is an acute tick-borne disease infecting people in the Middle East. A PCR test targeting the glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase (G1pQ) gene was used to detect infection in the blood of suspected relapsing fever patients. The assay detected infection in all 19 patients from Israel who were spirochetemic by blood smear examination and in two additional patients with clinical relapsing fever who were negative by smear examination. Patients were positive by PCR of blood only at the febrile stage and not during the incubation period prior to the appearance of clinical symptoms. Of 52 tick-bitten subjects who were tested and followed-up after being bitten by ticks, 10 developed symptoms of relapsing fever and all became positive by PCR following an earlier negative test. Partial sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene supported by phylogenetic analysis indicated that infection was caused by B. persica or a closely related species. A phylogenetic analysis of the G1pQ sequence showed that it was different yet closely related to other relapsing fever Borrelia spp. present in the Old World. The G1pQ PCR was positive also with the relapsing fever spirochetes B. recurrentis and B. crocidure but not with the Lyme disease agent B. burgdorferi DNA. A second modified G1pQ PCR was able to discriminate between probable B. persica and B. recurrentis and B. crocidurae infection. This study describes the first molecular assay for the diagnosis of relapsing fever caused by B. persica. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available