4.6 Article

Spectroscopic survey of red giants in the Small Magellanic Cloud. I. Kinematics

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 131, Issue 5, Pages 2514-2524

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/500974

Keywords

galaxies : evolution; galaxies : individual (Small Magellanic Cloud); galaxies : stellar content; Magellanic Clouds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a spectroscopic survey of 2046 red giant stars, distributed over the central 4 kpc x 2 kpc of the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC). After fitting and removing a small velocity gradient across the SMC (8.3 km s(-1) deg(-1) oriented at 23 degrees.4 east of north), we measure an rms velocity scatter of 27 +/- 0.5 kms(-1). The line-of-sight velocity distribution is well-characterized by a Gaussian, and the velocity dispersion profile is nearly constant as a function of radius. We find no kinematic evidence of tidal disturbances. Without a high-precision measurement of the SMC's proper motion, it is not possible to constrain its true rotation speed from our measured radial velocity gradient. However, even with conservative assumptions, we find that upsilon +/- sigma, and hence that the SMC is primarily supported by its velocity dispersion. We find that the shape of the SMC, as measured from the analysis of the spatial distribution of its red giant stars, is consistent with the degree of rotational flattening expected for the range of allowed nu/sigma values. As such, the properties of the SMC are consistent with similar low-luminosity spheroidal systems. We conclude that the SMC is primarily a low-luminosity spheroid whose irregular visual appearance is dominated by recent star formation. A simple virial analysis using the measured kinematics implies an enclosed mass within 1.6 kpc of between 1.4 and 1.9 x 10(9) M-circle dot and a less well-constrained mass within 3 kpc of between 2.7 and 5.1 x 10(9) M-circle dot.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available