4.5 Article

Blockade of histamine H2 receptors protects the heart against ischemia and reperfusion injury in dogs

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR CARDIOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages 666-674

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2006.02.001

Keywords

ischemia-reperfusion; myocardial infarction; coronary circulation; histamine; receptor pharmacology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have previously reported that histamine H-2 blockers may be cardioprotective in patients with chronic heart failure. Since both endogenous histamine and histamine H-2 receptors are present in heart tissue, we tested the hypothesis that the blockade of histamine H-2 receptors mediates protection against reversible or irreversible ischemia and reperfusion injury. In open-chest dogs, the left anterior descending coronary artery was occluded for 90 minutes, followed by reperfusion for 6 hours. Administration of famotidine and cimetidine from 10 minutes before occlusion until after 1 hour of reperfusion reduced inflict size (17.0 +/- 4.1% and 17.8 +/- 2.9% vs. 36.9 +/- 5.9% of the solvent group, respectively) Famotidine administration only during the reperfusion period for 1 hour also attenuated infarct size (22.5 +/- 3.5%). There were no differences in either area at risk or collateral flow among the groups. In another set of experiments, we decreased coronary perfusion pressure in dogs so that the coronary blood flow decreased to 50% of the non-ischemic level. In such conditions, we observed the increases in histamine release compared with non-ischemic conditions (0.04 +/- 0.03 to 0.28 +/- 0.13 ng/ml, p < 0.05). Famotidine improved anaerobic myocardial metabolism gauged by both lactate extraction ratio and myocardial oxygen consumption. We conclude that the blockade of histamine H, receptors mediates improvements in the anaerobic myocardial metabolism, and thus protects against ischemia and reperfusion injury. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available