4.7 Article

Pulmonary hypertension in obstructive sleep apnoea:: effects of continuous positive airway pressure -: A randomized, controlled cross-over study

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 27, Issue 9, Pages 1106-1113

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi807

Keywords

obstructive sleep apnoea; pulmonary hypertension; continuous positive airway pressure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims We tested the hypothesis that: (i) obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) by itself originates pulmonary hypertension (PH); and (ii) the application of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) can reduce pulmonary pressure. Methods and results In this randomized and cross-over trial, 23 middle-aged OSA (apnoea-hypopnoea index, 44.1 +/- 29.3 h(-1)) and otherwise healthy patients and 10 control subjects were included. OSA patients randomly received either sham or effective CPAP for 12 weeks. Echocardiographic parameters, blood pressure recordings, and urinary catecholamine levels were obtained at baseline and after both treatment modalities. At baseline, OSA patients had higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure than control subjects (29.8 +/- 8.8 vs. 23.4 +/- 4.1 mmHg, respectively, P=0.036). Ten out of 23 patients [43%, (95% CI: 23-64%)] and none of the control subjects had PH at baseline (P=0.012). Two patients were removed from the study because of inadequate CPAP compliance. Effective CPAP induced a significant reduction in the values for pulmonary systolic pressure (from 28.9 +/- 8.6 to 24.0 +/- 5.8 mmHg, P < 0.0001). The reduction was greatest in patients with either PH or left ventricular diastolic dysfunction at baseline. Conclusion Severe OSA is independently associated with PH in direct relationship with disease severity and presence of diastolic dysfunction. Application of CPAP reduces pulmonary systolic pressure levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available