4.6 Article

IgMA-enriched immunoglobulin in neutropenic patients with sepsis syndrome and septic shock:: A randomized, controlled, multiple-center trial

Journal

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages 1319-1325

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215452.84291.C6

Keywords

sepsis; severe sepsis; septic shock; immunoglobulin; neutropenia; hematologic malignancies; sepsis syndrome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate the effect of intravenous IgMA-enriched immunoglobulin (ivIGMA) therapy on mortality in neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies and sepsis syndrome or septic shock. Design: Multiple-center, prospective randomized, controlled study. Setting: Six university hospitals in Germany. Patients: Patients were 211 neutropenic patients with sepsis syndrome or septic shock after chemotherapy for severe hematologic disorders between 1992 and 1999. Interventions: Patients received 1300 mL of ivIGMA (7.8 g IgM, 7.8 g IgA, and 49.4 g IgG) infused intravenously within a period of 72 hrs or human albumin according to the same schedule as ivIGMA. Measurements and Main Results. All-cause mortality at 28 days, sepsis-related mortality at 28 days, all-cause mortality at 60 days, mortality from septic shock, and mortality from microbiologically proven Gram-negative sepsis and septic shock were recorded. Immunoglobulin had no benefit over human albumin. The 28-day mortality rate was 26.2% and 28.2% in the ivIGMA and control patients, respectively (difference, 2.0% [95% confidence interval, -10.2 to 14.2 percentage points]). Likewise, the 60-day mortality rate did not differ between both arms (29.6% vs. 34.7% in the ivIGMA and control patients, respectively). Mortality rates in patients with sepsis syndrome (17.1% vs. 16.7%) and septic shock (51.9% vs. 54.8%) were also found to be similar between both groups. Conclusions: Intravenous ivIGMA had no beneficial effects in neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies and sepsis syndrome and septic shock.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available