4.2 Article

Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector row computed tomography in T- and N staging of gastric cancer with histopathologic correlation

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 372-377

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200605000-00005

Keywords

computed tomography; multidetector row; gastric cancer; staging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) for the preoperative T- and N staging of gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: Eighty-four consecutive patients with gastric cancer underwent preoperative MDCT. Except for 15 patients who did not undergo surgery, 69 patients were included in our study. Two radiologists independently evaluated the T- and N staging on the axial CT images alone and in combination with the MPR images. For N staging, the new TNM and Japanese classifications were independently used. Differences in staging accuracy for T- and N staging were assessed using the McNemar test. Results: The overall T staging accuracy of the axial and combined axial and MPR images was as follows: 67% (47 of 70 cancers) versus 77% (54 of 70 cancers) (P = 0.039). The overall N staging accuracy of the axial and combined axial and MPR images was as follows: 59% (41 of 69 cancers) versus 67% (46 of 69 cancers) (P = 0.180, Japanese classification) and 54% (37 of 69 cancers) versus 59% (41 of 69 cancers) (P = 0.109, TNM classification). Conclusions: Using MPR images enables more accurate preoperative T staging of gastric cancer, but not for N staging in either classification system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available