4.4 Article

Feeding specialization in Herichthys minckleyi:: a trophically polymorphic fish

Journal

JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages 1399-1410

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-1112.2006.01021.x

Keywords

Cichlidae; Hydrobiidae; individual specialization; Mexico; teeth

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diet specialization in the trophically polymorphic cichlid fish Herichthys minckleyi was examined using gut contents. Individual H. minckleyi were categorized as having molariform, papilliform or undetermined pharyngeal jaws. The presence of enlarged flattened pharyngeal jaw teeth was used to categorize H. minckleyi as molariform, and the possession of only small pencil-like pharyngeal teeth was used to classify fish as papilliform. Undetermined individuals (< 50 mm standard length, L-S) were not assigned to one of the two larger morphotypes. Arthropods were found to be generally rare in H. minckleyi gut contents, but when present, they were most frequently recovered from undetermined individuals. The percentage of plant material consumed by undetermined H. minckleyi was not as great as papilliforms ingested on average, and snail crushing by undetermined H. minckleyi was not evident. A significantly greater mean percentage of plant detritus was recovered from papilliforms compared to molariforms. Snails were crushed by molariforms more frequently than by papilliforms. When only molariforms and papilliforms that had crushed snails were compared, a greater number of snails were crushed by molariforms. No relationship was found between molariform L-S and the number of snails crushed, but greater molariform tooth number, adjusted for L-S, was indicative of recent snail crushing. The maintenance of H. minckleyi pharyngeal jaw variation could be promoted by intraspecific diet differentiation. (c) 2006 The Authors Journal compilation (c) 2006 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available