4.4 Article

In rats chronically treated with clozapine, tyrosine depletion attenuates the clozapine-induced in vivo increase in prefrontal cortex dopamine and norepinephrine levels

Journal

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 185, Issue 4, Pages 416-422

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-005-0283-1

Keywords

tyrosine; clozapine; medial prefrontal cortex; dopamine; norepinephrine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We previously reported that depletion of brain tyrosine attenuated the acute clozapine (CLZ)-induced increase in medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) dopamine (DA) levels. This effect was now examined after chronic CLZ treatment. Male rats received CLZ (10 mg kg(-1) day(-1)) in drinking water for 21 days. On day 18, a cannula was stereotaxically implanted over the MPFC. A microdialysis probe was inserted on day 20. On day 21 after a stable baseline was reached, rats received an acute injection of vehicle (VEH) or a tyrosine- and phenylalanine-free mixture of neutral amino acid [NAA(-)] (total 1 g kg(-1), i.p., two injections, 1 h apart) followed by CLZ (10 mg kg(-1), i.p.) or VEH. Basal tyrosine or norepinephrine (NE) levels were not different between the groups, but basal DA was higher in the group treated chronically with CLZ (p < 0.05). Acute CLZ (10 mg kg(-1), i.p.) increased MPFC DA and NE levels to 370% and 510% of baseline, respectively, and similarly in rats chronically pretreated with CLZ or VEH. NAA(-) did not affect basal MPFC DA or NE levels but significantly attenuated acute CLZ-induced DA (220% of baseline) and NE (330% of baseline) levels (p < 0.01) in rats pretreated chronically with CLZ or with VEH. These data demonstrate that even after chronic CLZ administration, the acute CLZ-induced increases in MPFC DA and NE levels depend on the availability of brain tyrosine. Judicious manipulation of brain tyrosine levels may provide a useful probe as well as a mechanism for enhancing psychotropic drug actions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available