4.5 Article

The influence of early cycling training on balance in stroke patients at the subacute stage. Results of a preliminary trial

Journal

CLINICAL REHABILITATION
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 398-405

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr960oa

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate the effect of early cycling training on balance and motor abilities of stroke patients in their subacute stage. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation. Subjects: Twenty-four patients who had had a first stroke were randomly assigned to a cycling training group ( N = 10) or to a control ( N = 14) group. Intervention: All subjects received their usual rehabilitation programme; the cycling training group received in addition a daily session of leg cycle ergometer, lasting three weeks. Both groups were followed for six weeks. Main outcome measurements: Balance was assessed using the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients ( PASS) and the standing balance test. The motor function of the lower extremity was also assessed by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA). Results: In the within-group comparison, both the exercise group and the control group had improved significantly ( P < 0.01) with time with respect to PASS total ( exercise group 18.7 +/- 2.8 to 31.1 +/- 2.2, control group 18.1 +/- 3.2 to 26.4 +/- 3.8) and PASS subscores, as well as the FMA score ( exercise group 17.2 +/- 7.5 to 29.1 +/- 5.9, control group 16.6 +/- 6.4 to 22.1 +/- 6.8). In addition there was a significant group - time interaction effect, with exercise group patients demonstrating better performance in both the total PASS score and PASS subscores and FMA score relative to the control patients ( P < 0.01). Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest that stroke patients in the subacute stage can improve their motor and balance abilities after an early short duration of cycling training.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available