Journal
SYNTHESE
Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages 1-14Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-004-6264-9
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Tim Maudlin's argument for the inconsistency of Cramer's Transactional Interpretation (TI) of quantum theory has been considered in some detail by Joseph Berkovitz, who has provided a possible solution to this challenge at the cost of a significant empirical lacuna on the part of TI. The present paper proposes an alternative solution in which Maudlin's charge of inconsistency is evaded but at no cost of empirical content on the part of TI. However, Maudlin's argument is taken as ruling out Cramer's heuristic pseudotime explanation of the realization of one transaction out of many.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available