4.7 Article

Biodegradability of bio-flour filled biodegradable poly(butylene succinate) bio-composites in natural and compost soil

Journal

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages 1117-1127

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.07.002

Keywords

bio-flour; poly(butylene succinate); biodegradability; microbial counts; bio-composites; green-composites; eco-materials; compost soil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the biodegradability of PBS and bio-flour, which is a poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) bio-composite filled with rice-husk flour (RHF) reinforcing, in natural and aerobic compost soil. The percentage weight loss and the reduction in mechanical properties of PBS and the bio-composites in the compost soil burial test were significantly greater than those in the natural soil burial test. These results were supported by degraded surface of PBS and bio-composites observed through morphological study and the total colony count of natural soil was lower than that of compost soil. The biodegradability of the bio-composites was enhanced with increasing bio-flour content because the bio-flour is easily attacked by microorganisms. As the biodegradability test progressed over time up to 80 days, the molecular weight of PBS decreased in the soil burial test. We confirmed by attenuated total reflectance (FTIR-ATR) analyser that the chemical structures of PBS and the bio-composites were changed after the compost burial test. The glass transition temperature (T-g), melting temperature (T-m), crystallization temperature (T-c), heat of fusion (Delta H-f) and heat of crystallization (Delta H-c) of the natural and composted soil tested PBS were investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). From the results, we concluded that use of these bio-composites will reduce the environmental problems associated with waste pollution and the study findings support the predicted application of bio-composites as green-composites or eco-materials. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available