4.8 Article

Lactate dehydrogenase-B is silenced by promoter hypermethylation in human prostate cancer

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 25, Issue 20, Pages 2953-2960

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209262

Keywords

prostate cancer; hypermethylation; proteomic; benign prostatic hyperplasia; metastatic

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G0100444] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [G0100444] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [G0100444] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to identify novel candidates associated with prostate cancer metastasis, we compared the proteomic pro. le of the poorly metastatic human prostate cancer cell line LNCaP, with its highly metastatic variant LNCaP-LN3, by two- dimensional gel electrophoresis. A major protein spot ( pI of 5.9 and molecular weight of 37 kDa) was seen in LNCaP cells, but not in LNCaP- LN3 cells and was identified as lactate dehydrogenase- B ( LDHB), by tandem mass spectrometry. Furthermore, enzyme kinetic assays and zymography showed a higher LDH enzyme activity in LNCaP cells compared with LNCaP-LN3. Bisulphite- modified DNA sequencing showed promoter hypermethylation in LNCaP- LN3 cells but not in LNCaP, Du145, PC3, CWR22 or BPH45 cells. Treatment of LNCaP- LN3 cells with 5'- azacytidine caused re-expression of LDHB transcripts. In tissues, LDHB promoter hypermethylation occurred at a higher frequency in prostate cancer, 14/ 31 ( 45%), compared to adjacent nonmalignant or benign tissue, 2/ 19 ( 11%) ( P < 0.025). Immunohistochemistry showed a higher frequency of LDHB expression in benign or nonmalignant tissues, 59/ 73 ( 81%), compared to cancer cases, 3/ 53 ( 6%) ( P < 0.001). Absent LDHB expression was also seen in 7/ 7 ( 100%) cases of metastatic cancer in bone. Our data are the first to show loss of LDHB expression in prostate cancer, the mechanism of which appears to involve promoter hypermethylation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available